Evidence check · July 2026Current rules and proposals, kept separate. View sources
WELLDASH

Body first.

Diagnostic overshadowing — reading a bodily illness as part of someone’s behaviour or disability — is the standing finding of the UK mortality reviews. It is not a knowledge problem: the staff who miss it know that pain causes distress. It is an order-of-operations problem. So WellDash puts the order into the structure of the record rather than into a training slide.

The override outranksPINCH ME at captureFails closedNever auto-escalates

What a safety spine has to do to be one.

A policy that says “consider physical causes” is not a safeguard. These four properties are what turn the intention into something the record actually enforces.

Distinction 1

Unexplained is a body question

New, unexplained or out of character does not start a behavioural conversation. It starts a physical one, and the record enforces the order rather than recommending it.

Distinction 2

A checklist that fails closed

Each first-pass prompt maps onto authored typed causes. A prompt with no authored mapping is an error in the system, never a quiet guess about the person.

Distinction 3

Three lanes, never merged

What happened now, what is different from this person’s usual, and what is known about their life are shown side by side for a human to read together. The machine does not blend them into a verdict.

Distinction 4

A test beats an interpretation

Treat, then resolve, dated: the dechallenge is the strongest thing a care record can hold, because it is the one piece of evidence that was tested rather than argued.

The rule NICE NG11

When anything is unexplained, the body question outranks

The override is simple to state and hard to hold: when a behaviour is new, unexplained, or out of character for this person, no behavioural reading is served until physical causes have been considered. In the record it is a strategy in its own right — body_first — not a caveat attached to something else.

The clinical shorthand the field uses is constipation until proven otherwise, and it is a good summary of the posture: start from the most common, most silent, most treatable causes, and make the team prove their absence rather than assume it. NICE NG11 puts physical causes first for exactly this reason.

Structuring it as an override rather than a reminder matters because the failure it prevents is a failure under pressure. Nobody forgets that pain matters on a calm day. The record has to hold the order on the day when the behaviour is loud and the shift is short.

Live

PINCH ME at capture, opening onto a typed differential

Seven first-pass prompts sit at capture — pain, infection, nutrition, constipation, hydration, medication, environment — the learning-disability nursing checklist most UK teams already know. Each prompt is bound by an authored mapping onto the precise typed causes it covers, and behind them sits a differential of twenty-four physical causes as a typed vocabulary rather than free text.

  • The mapping fails closed. A prompt with no authored mapping is an error in the system, never a guess about the person. Safety vocabularies must be unable to improvise.
  • Considered is recorded as considered. A rule-out that a carer actively thought about is a positive fact in the record, which is precisely what the mortality reviews find missing after the event.
  • Prompts are for the human. The seven are a first pass to make thinking fast, not a triage algorithm. Nothing is scored, ranked or concluded from them.
Direction. An assembled PINCH ME shell — every letter presented as a checklist bound to its live detector, so the whole differential can be walked in one surface — is designed over the pieces described here. The pieces are live; the assembled shell is not yet shipped.
Live

Three lanes, shown together, never merged

When something is off, three different kinds of knowledge matter at once, and blending them destroys all three. WellDash shows them as lanes:

  • What happened now — the episode as recorded, in the carer’s own words and its typed pieces.
  • What is different from this person’s usual — the departure from their own pattern, which is the only baseline that means anything for one person.
  • What is known about their life — the standing facts: conditions, medications, the things that have always been true.

They are laid side by side for a human to read together. The machine does not merge them into a single verdict, because the merge is exactly where a clinician’s judgement belongs and exactly where a confident-sounding system would do the most harm.

The strongest evidence

The dechallenge: treat, resolve, dated

A synthetic example, of the kind the record holds every day: the tapping starts, the bowel clock reads five days, a laxative is given, the bowels open, the tapping stops. Each of those is a dated row, and together they are a dechallenge — the physical cause was treated and the behaviour resolved.

The reason this outranks any interpretation is that it was a test. And when the same chain has happened before, the record shows it as this person’s own repeated result rather than a hunch — which is what changes the conversation with a GP, a nurse or a panel from impression to evidence.

Boundary. A dechallenge is evidence about this person, not proof of a mechanism, and the record presents it as what it is: the same thing was tried and the same thing followed, on these dates.
Governance STOMP

The clinical graph, used lawfully

A clinician-authored graph of symptom → consideration → disposition triples sits behind the body-first work. It is used in exactly two ways, and no others: as typed vocabulary, and as authored disposition edges that a human activates. Every row carries its provenance, and every render carries the line that the human decides.

  • Escalation is an authored, human-activated edge armed with the evidence. The machine never routes an emergency call.
  • Nothing in the graph produces a diagnosis, a probability or an instruction. It supplies the considerations a competent human would want in front of them.
  • Medication sits under the same discipline: STOMP is the standing warrant that a chemical response is never the answer to a body problem — and a medication given as a response is recorded as an intervention with a before and an after, like every other response, so it can be examined rather than assumed.
Published science NHS LeDeR

Where the priority comes from

The Confidential Inquiry into Premature Deaths of People with Learning Disabilities (CIPOLD, 2013) established the scale of avoidable death in this population, and the NHS LeDeR programme has been reviewing lives and deaths since, publishing the recurring themes. Those themes are unglamorous and consistent: constipation, aspiration, sepsis, untreated pain, medication harm, and communication failures around all of them.

NICE NG11 translates this into guidance — physical causes first, before a behavioural formulation is treated as the explanation. The clocks and the differential in this system watch for what those reviews keep finding.

Boundary. LeDeR’s findings are epidemiological. They shape what the record watches for; they never become a prediction about an individual. A casebook built from published mortality and safeguarding reviews was used to stress-test this machinery against known failure patterns before it shipped — that is a design test, not a claim about any person’s risk.
For the report

What this puts in front of a clinician, a family or a panel

  • The rule-outs that were actively considered, with dates — the answer to “was the body checked?” that is otherwise reconstructed from memory after the event.
  • The body clocks beside the behaviour, so a pattern that looked behavioural can be re-read as physical without anyone having to remember the week.
  • Any dated dechallenge chain: what was suspected, what was done, what followed.
  • An ambulance grab sheet that assembles from the same record — identity, alerts, conditions, medications, this person’s own deterioration signs, what helps, and the most recent logs and incidents — for the moment when a paramedic has ninety seconds and the person cannot explain.
  • A personal emergency evacuation plan built from the same substrate: mobility, transfers, communication, sensory needs, and behaviour under stress.

None of these are written from scratch at the moment they are needed. They print from what was already recorded — and a field nobody recorded prints as a gap, never as a guess.

FAQ

Questions, answered the way we answer them

What happens when behaviour is actually pain?

The body-first override outranks every behavioural reading. The system surfaces the co-occurrence evidence — the bowel, sleep and intake clocks, the typed rule-outs, any prior dated dechallenge — so the human call is an informed one. Constipation until proven otherwise, with the person’s own record attached.

Does it call 999 automatically?

Never. Escalation is an authored, human-activated step armed with the evidence; the machine never routes an emergency call on its own.

How do you use LeDeR?

As the safety lens it is. LeDeR’s themes shape what the clocks and rule-outs watch for, and published reviews were used to stress-test the machinery against known failure patterns. Its limits define ours: epidemiology shapes watches — it never becomes per-person prediction.

What is a dechallenge, and why is it the strongest evidence?

Treat the suspected physical cause and see whether the behaviour resolves — recorded, and dated. It is the strongest evidence a care record can hold about this person because it is a test rather than an interpretation, and when the same chain has happened before, the record shows it as this person’s own repeated result.

Is PINCH ME a diagnosis?

No. It is a first-pass prompt set — pain, infection, nutrition, constipation, hydration, medication, environment — that opens onto a typed differential of physical causes so the consideration is recorded as considered. What it produces is evidence for a human decision, never a conclusion.

Where does medication sit in this?

Inside the same record and under the same rule. STOMP is the standing warrant that a chemical response is never the answer to a body problem, and a medication given as a response is recorded as an intervention with a before and an after like any other — so it can be examined rather than assumed.

See the body-first lens on one synthetic person.

The demonstration shows capture, the typed grammar, the body-first lens and the ranked responses on synthetic records.