Evidence check · July 2026Current rules and proposals, kept separate. View sources
WellDash.ai

See the plan being lived—not merely reviewed.

A thoughtful plan should not disappear into a document until the next formal review. WellDash connects confirmed frontline observations to the relevant plan step, so you can review what was tried and what happened next.

Evidence at the plan stepAction linked to outcomeHuman-approved plan changes
The plan is not a document about care. It is the governed structure care can learn against.
Design goal for practitioners

Turn formulation into support staff can use.

Understanding possible function is not enough on its own. The practical question is what the authorised plan asks staff to recognise, consider and do at this step for this person.

01 · Author

Keep the person-specific plan clear.

Baseline, setting events, early indicators, functional hypotheses, proactive support, reactive boundaries and escalation remain practitioner-authored and approved.

02 · Observe

See how the plan is lived.

Confirmed frontline moments arrive against the relevant person, domain, phase and plan step rather than in a pile of retrospective notes.

03 · Compare

Keep action beside outcome.

What was tried, how much support was needed and what happened next can be reviewed in comparable contexts without pretending correlation is proof.

04 · Question

Let life connect across the record.

A difficult water-play moment can also update sleep and relationship context. Several relevant perspectives can be kept without forcing one winning category.

05 · Approve

Learning does not silently become instruction.

The system can propose wording or a plan change with evidence and confidence. An authorised practitioner accepts, rejects or requests more information.

PBS becomes continuous without becoming autonomous.

The same confirmed care moment is shown in the way that is useful and appropriate for you. No one needs to copy the original moment into another system.

Continuous evidence, governed decisions

The review starts from linked events and outcomes rather than reconstructing a six-month narrative.

Setting, trigger, function and response

The formulation can reach the practical step where a worker needs to recognise and respond.

See where the plan no longer fits

Repeated departures, improvised strategies and changing support needs become visible for human review.

AI may draft. Authorised humans approve.

Research and literature inform plan authoring. At the point of care, WellDash surfaces the current approved, person-specific plan. Authorised professionals retain review and approval responsibility.

The model serves a specific authored step instead of drawing conclusions across an entire record.
Proposed learning retains source events, rationale, uncertainty and safety boundaries.
Approval creates a versioned plan change and an acknowledgement path; it does not overwrite history.

The record should arrive already useful.

See how WellDash connects the approved plan, the care moment and what the team learns next.